Ian Bicking: the old part of his blog

Apps apps apps comment 000

This is part of why I think it's important, having created applications other people want to use, that we create a situation where they are encouraged to extend and expand upon those applications. An environment of complimentary applications, plugins, and general customizing experience cannot be easily duplicated. So while a nice encapsulated zip file has a certain appeal, I also want people to feel they can jump into the code without destroying the application or getting themselves in trouble in the future.

Comment on Re: Applications! Applications! Applications!
by Ian Bicking


I'm starting to give up the goal of a mainstream Python.

Yesterday I needed a way to reach out from a Python program and respond to a Windows GUI prompt for a password. A prompt that I had not expected when writing the app. Panic time!

I Googled for help and found the watsup module. Wow, what a clean, well designed and documented package. Built on top of other similarly impressive Python packages. I'm grateful for the help, excited to have so much power available to me and anxious to show off this stuff to other programmers. I already liked Python. But this is an additional layer of appreciation. And, although purely as a side note, a good example of the value of a high quality framework.

My real point is that the big win for Python is not the watsup package but that Python, well designed or not, attracted the creator(s) of watsup. I see Python as a filter that only certain people can get past. If scope by indent and crippled threads keep certain people (most Java programmers) away and let the watsup creator pass though, then... maybe that's best.

Maybe the developers who have told me it's better to do it right than be popular are correct. I'll try to find peace with that thought. And be happy to have made it past the filter myself.

# John Mudd